{"id":13216,"date":"2022-08-22T01:04:38","date_gmt":"2022-08-22T01:04:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nftandcrypto-news.com\/crypto\/binance-vs-ftx-cz-calls-out-bad-players-for-crypto-exchange-jitters\/"},"modified":"2022-08-22T01:04:40","modified_gmt":"2022-08-22T01:04:40","slug":"binance-vs-ftx-cz-calls-out-bad-players-for-crypto-exchange-jitters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nftandcrypto-news.com\/crypto\/binance-vs-ftx-cz-calls-out-bad-players-for-crypto-exchange-jitters\/","title":{"rendered":"Binance vs. FTX: CZ calls out \u2018bad players\u2019 for crypto exchange jitters"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

The CEO of crypto exchange Binance, Changpeng \u2018CZ\u2019 Zhao, raised concern for traders after learning about the infamous phenomenon of trade jitters on other crypto exchanges.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Jitters in crypto trading relate to a trade event wherein an investor\u2019s buy or sell order gets stuck and moves down in the list, allowing newer trade orders to go through.<\/p>\n

\n

Just learned a new word, jitters. On 1 particular exchange, sometimes your orders will be stuck for a bit, and a few other orders will get in front of you. Apparently, this happens often enough on this exchange that the traders coined a term for it, jitters. (Front running) <\/p>\n

\u2014 CZ Binance (@cz_binance) August 19, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

While CZ\u2019s concerns against jitters did not explicitly target any particular exchange, the crypto community on Twitter assumed it was a dig at FTX, a crypto exchange led by Sam Bankman-Fried. Responding to the community\u2019s reaction that suggested \u2018jitters\u2019 as a well-known and accepted situation, CZ added:<\/p>\n

\u201cAll of you guys knew and didn’t say anything. We need to fight the bad players.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

CZ further reached out to the VIP traders on Binance, who allegedly confirmed knowing about the illicit trade activities. The indirect allegation against FTX perfectly coincides with the timeline when the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued cease and desist order to the exchange and four other crypto companies.<\/p>\n

According to the FDIC, FTX US, SmartAssets, FDICCrypto, Cryptonews and Cryptosec allegedly misled investors by claiming their products were insured by the FDIC. Reacting to the order, FTX US president Brett Harrison deleted a tweet<\/a> making the claims opposed by the FDIC. However, Crypto Twitter was quick to point out numerous other instances when Harrison falsely claimed FDIC insurance. <\/p>\n

\n

pic.twitter.com\/6u06tJjS6E<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 AG123 (@AG123321GA) August 19, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In an attempt to cushion the freefall, SBF revealed his intent to work with the FDIC in the future while reiterating the fact that \u201cFTX US isn’t FDIC insured.\u201d<\/p>\n

Related: <\/em><\/strong>United Texas Bank CEO wants to ‘limit the issuance of US dollar-backed stablecoins to banks’<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Running parallel to the above developments, FTX has reportedly begun blocking accounts that have sent cryptocurrencies through zk.money, a private layer-2 chain provided by the Aztec Network on Ethereum.<\/p>\n

\n

Recently, FTX froze a user account who sent coins to @aztecnetwork<\/a> ‘s zkmoney. According to FTX, Aztec Connect – Aztec network \/ zk money has been identified as a mixing service, which is a high-risk activity prohibited by FTX.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) August 19, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In response, SBF backed FTX\u2019s decision to monitor the accounts citing anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. However, he refuted the claims by adding, \u201cbut that does not mean that any accounts were frozen.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n