{"id":20996,"date":"2023-08-10T17:00:36","date_gmt":"2023-08-10T17:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nftandcrypto-news.com\/crypto\/dear-crypto-writers-no-one-wants-to-read-your-chatgpt-generated-trash\/"},"modified":"2023-08-10T17:00:38","modified_gmt":"2023-08-10T17:00:38","slug":"dear-crypto-writers-no-one-wants-to-read-your-chatgpt-generated-trash","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nftandcrypto-news.com\/crypto\/dear-crypto-writers-no-one-wants-to-read-your-chatgpt-generated-trash\/","title":{"rendered":"Dear crypto writers: No one wants to read your ChatGPT-generated trash"},"content":{"rendered":"
There was a time when anything generated by ChatGPT was fascinating.\u00a0<\/p>\n
To fathom that a super-intelligent robot was writing poetry, drafting legal documents or even acting as a personal life coach was mind-boggling. <\/p>\n
As if each prompt was a window into a kind of shared human consciousness.<\/p>\n
That was the novelty then, at least. But it\u2019s been nine months since GPT-3 and almost five months since the launch of GPT-4.<\/p>\n
In May, a crypto firm shared a 10-minute video presentation it had whipped up about artificial intelligence\u2019s role in increasing business productivity (in the hopes of coverage). <\/p>\n
Ironically, the presenter was an AI-generated avatar reading from a script most likely lifted straight out of ChatGPT. It took all of 20 seconds to close it.<\/p>\n
Related: <\/em><\/strong>Worldcoin: Should you let Sam Altman scan your eyeballs for WLD?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Oh, was it written by a bot? No worries, send it to my AI transcriber.<\/p>\n Another great example came in recently from a colleague who received a pitch from a third party \u2014 offering an article on how to use MetaMask more efficiently.<\/p>\n The 1,159-word explainer discussed six cold wallets that could be connected to MetaMask, a potentially relevant subject given the recent spate of hot wallet hacks, such as the $23 million hack of the Bitrue crypto exchange on April 14.<\/p>\n At first glance, the article was decently written. It had an introduction, a sub-introduction and six subheadings for each individual cold wallet, followed by a conclusion. There wasn\u2019t a single grammatical error.<\/p>\n Packed with facts but void of any personality, flair or human element. No impactful conclusions.<\/p>\n \u201cEach of these wallets has its unique features and advantages, so it\u2019s important to do your research and choose the one that best suits your needs,\u201d was its fireworks ending.<\/p>\n Surprise, surprise. The article came back on an AI detection tool as 74.2% AI\/GPT generated. Even the cover letter that pitched the idea wasn\u2019t authentic \u2014 scoring a whopping 93.57% on ZeroGPT. <\/p>\nUnfortunately, it reads like the nutritional label of a cereal box<\/h2>\n