{"id":9057,"date":"2022-03-05T19:48:18","date_gmt":"2022-03-05T19:48:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nftandcrypto-news.com\/crypto\/impermanent-loss-challenges-the-claim-that-defi-is-the-future-of-france\/"},"modified":"2022-03-05T19:48:20","modified_gmt":"2022-03-05T19:48:20","slug":"impermanent-loss-challenges-the-claim-that-defi-is-the-future-of-france","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nftandcrypto-news.com\/crypto\/impermanent-loss-challenges-the-claim-that-defi-is-the-future-of-france\/","title":{"rendered":"Impermanent loss challenges the claim that DeFi is the \u2018future of France\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
Impermanent loss is one of the most recognized risks that investors have to contend with when providing liquidity to an automated market maker (AMM) in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector. Although it is not an actual loss incurred from the liquidity provider\u2019s (LP) position \u2014 rather an opportunity cost that occurs when compared with simply buying and holding the same assets \u2014 the possibility of getting less value back at withdrawal is enough to keep many investors away from DeFi.<\/p>\n
Impermanent loss is driven by the volatility between the two assets in the equal-ratio pool \u2014 the more one asset moves up or down relative to the other asset, the more impermanent loss is incurred. Providing liquidity to stablecoins, or simply avoiding volatile asset pairs, is an easy way to reduce impermanent loss. However, the yields from these strategies might not be as attractive. <\/p>\n
So, the question is: Are there ways to participate in a high-yield LP pool and at the same time reduce as much impermanent loss as possible? <\/em><\/p>\n
Fortunately for retail investors, the answer is yes, as new innovations continue to solve the existing problems in the DeFi world, providing many ways for traders to avoid impermanent loss. <\/p>\n
Uneven liquidity pools help reduce impermanent loss<\/h3>\n
When talking about impermanent loss, people often refer to the traditional 50%\/50% equal-ratio two-asset pool \u2014 i.e., investors have to provide liquidity to two assets at the same value. As DeFi protocols evolve, uneven liquidity pools have come into the picture to help reduce impermanent loss. <\/p>\n
As shown in the graph below, the downside magnitude from an equal-ratio pool is much larger than an uneven pool. Given the same relative price change \u2014 e.g., Ether (ETH) increases or decreases by 10% relative to USD Coin (USDC) \u2014 the more uneven the ratio of the two assets, the less the impermanent loss. <\/p>\n